Possibilities of investigative work psychoanalytic at university
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to explain a position on the research based on psychoanalytic theory in a Mexican university, leaving in the first instance established that: think that the psychoanalytic knowledge and the method of its constitution has no place in universities, is to accept that this knowledge is not has a foundation that is proper. To this argument is part of the inaugural Freudian text on the subject of universitypsychoanalysis to quickly address the thorny problem between psychoanalysis, science and subject, as the backdrop for the vicissitudes of psychoanalytic research, from whose findings may be seated a position that justifies the relevance and possibilities of it in the university context.
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The authors have the right to ownership or copyright and they give to "Uaricha Psychology Magazine" the right to publish for the first time the article, as well as disclose and distribute it on the technological available media and through repositories.
Uaricha Psychology Magazine, is a quarterly publication, published by the Psychology College of the "Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo", Street Francisco Villa No. 450, Col. Dr. Miguel Silva, Morelia, Michoacán, P. C. 58110. Phone (+52) 443 312 9909, ext. 149, www.revistauaricha.umich.mx, uaricha.publicaciones@umich.mx. Responsible publisher: Roberto Oropeza Tena. Reserve of exclusive use rights No. 04-2013-070413365500-203, e-ISSN: 2007-7343, Granted by the National Institute Copyright. Responsible of the last update of this number, Computer center of the Psychology College, Ing. Erick Vidar Alva Rangel.
How to Cite
References
Bento, V. E. S. (2007). Totem e Tabu: uma "semiologia psicanalítica" em Freud? Estud. psicol. (Campinas) [online]. 2007, vol.24, n.3. ISSN 0103-166X.
Eildelztein, A. (2008). Las estructuras clínicas a partir de Lacan, Intérvalo y holofrase, locura, psicosis, psicosomática y debilidad mental. Tomo I. Buenos Aires: Letra Viva.
Freud, S. (1919[1918]/ 1986). ¿Debe enseñarse el psicoanálisis en la universidad? En Obras completas, Vol. 17. Buenos Aires: Amorrortu.
Fonagy, P., Gerber, A., Kächele, H., Krause, R., Jones, E., Perron, R. et al.(2002). An open door review of outcome studies in Psychoanalysis. 2nd revised edition. London: In-ternational Psychoanalytic Association.
Gerber, D. (2007). Discurso y verdad. Psicoanálisis, saber creación. México: Gradiva.
Jardim, L. L. (2008). “A pesquisa fundamental em Psicanálise: Um modelo para o tratamen-to da Esquizofrenia”. In: Anais da Segunda Jornada Internacional de Pesquisa em Psicanálise e Fenomenologia. Campinas: PUC-CAMPINAS.
Jardim, L.L. & Rojas, H.M.C. (2010). “Investigación psicoanalítica en la universidad”. En: Revista Estudios de psicología, Vol. 27, N. 4, 2010 ISSN 0103-166X: PUC-CAMPINAS.
Lacan, J. (1965/2003). “La Ciencia y la verdad”. En: Escritos 2. México: Siglo XXI.
Lacan, J. (1969-1970/1992). “El Reverso del Psicoanálisis”. El seminario libro17. Buenos Aires: Paidós.
Miller, J-A. (2010). “La transmisión del psicoanálisis”. En Desde Lacan. Conferencias Por-teñas. Tomo 3. Argentina: Paidós.
Reyes A. (2007). “El psicoanalista, la Universidad y la ciencia: la repetición en el deseo” ponencia presentada en el IV Foro Regional El Psicoanálisis en la Universidad. La transmisión del Psicoanálisis” en la Universidad Autónoma de Querétaro.
Roudinesco, E. (2001). “Réponses aux questions de Mario Cifali”. En: Revue Le bloc.notes de la Psychanalyse. No 17. Être freudien aujourdhui. Paris: Georg.
Schorske, C. (1983). “Vienne Fin du siècle. Cit Roudinesco in Réponses aux questions de Mario Cifali. En: Revue Le bloc.notes de la Psychanalyse. No 17. Être freudien au-jourdhui. Paris: Georg.