Study group. A possibility in the transmission of psychoanalysis
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The transmission of Psychoanalysis has been a controversial since its origin. An increasing institutionalization has made it deviate from the original guidelines set by its main authors: Freud and Lacan. Some places that today offers psychoanalytic training undergoes subjects to a set of dogmas and rigid parameters for obtaining a knowledge. Thus, certain psychoanalytic theory’s peculiarities such as questioning, reflection and criticism have become unnecessary tools in some of the university discourses. This article gives an account of this controversy and raises study groups as an alternative in psychoanalysis transmission. It is a proposal emerged from the experience of a particular group called “Círculo cero” which bases its functioning on guidelines as the work transference, love and the desire rather than institutional aspects that lead to obtaining degrees and certifications.
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The authors have the right to ownership or copyright and they give to "Uaricha Psychology Magazine" the right to publish for the first time the article, as well as disclose and distribute it on the technological available media and through repositories.
Uaricha Psychology Magazine, is a quarterly publication, published by the Psychology College of the "Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo", Street Francisco Villa No. 450, Col. Dr. Miguel Silva, Morelia, Michoacán, P. C. 58110. Phone (+52) 443 312 9909, ext. 149, www.revistauaricha.umich.mx, uaricha.publicaciones@umich.mx. Responsible publisher: Roberto Oropeza Tena. Reserve of exclusive use rights No. 04-2013-070413365500-203, e-ISSN: 2007-7343, Granted by the National Institute Copyright. Responsible of the last update of this number, Computer center of the Psychology College, Ing. Erick Vidar Alva Rangel.
How to Cite
References
Foucault, M. (2010). El orden del discurso. México: Fábula tusquets editores.
Freud, S. (1915/2003). Pulsiones y destinos de pulsión. Obras Completas. Vol. XIV. Buenos Aires: Amorrortu.
Freud, S. (1919/2003). ¿Debe enseñarse el psicoanálisis en la universidad?. Obras Completas. Vol. XVII. Buenos Aires: Amorrortu.
Hofstein, F. (2006). El amor del cuerpo. Buenos Aires: Nueva visión.
Lacan, J. (1953-54/2007). Seminario 1. Los escritos técnicos de Freud. Buenos Aires: Paidós
Lacan, J. (1955-56/2009). Seminario 3. Las psicosis. Buenos aires: Paidós.
Lacan, J. (1964/2010). Seminario 11. Los cuatro conceptos fundamentales del psicoanálisis.Buenos Aires: Paidós.
Lacan, J. (1969-70/2004). Seminario 17. El reverso del psicoanálisis. Buenos Aires: Paidós.
Lacan, J. (1971/2009). Seminario 18. De un discurso que no sería de apariencia. Buenos Aires: Paidós.
Lacan, J. (1972-73/2008). Seminario 20. Aún. Buenos Aires: Paidós.
Miller, J. -A. (2000). El banquete de los analistas. Argentina: Paidós.
Tamayo, L. (2004). El discipulado en la formación del psicoanalista. Un aporte del psicoanálisis a la pedagogía. México: Sello de agua Ensayo.
Tappan, M. J. (2004). Epistemología y psicoanálisis. San Luis Potosí: Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí