Couple relationships between men, (dissident masculinities) myths, realities and diversities ...
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article intends to identify and understand couple relationships beyond the systems and/or hegemonic models, dichotomous, antagonistic and hierarchical: hetero/normative-homoerotic-sexist and phallocentric. The reason for this proposal is because all systems and previous models attempt to prosecute, convict, regulate, control, name, classify, pathologize, stigmatize and exclude from the point of view of heterosexual relationships that fall outside heteronormativity, to homosexual relationships, through all those dissident “minority” peripheral sexual practices. Such attitudes are based on simplistic assumptions without truthful foundations, mostly political, religious, legal, moral and biomedical-psychiatric, designed to reproduce
the models so far considered “natural”, at the expense of promoting discrimination such as sexism, homophobia and other forms of exclusion based on physical, psychological and generic-sexual characteristics , which creates all kinds of violence ranging from abuse to rape, and to sex crimes.
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The authors have the right to ownership or copyright and they give to "Uaricha Psychology Magazine" the right to publish for the first time the article, as well as disclose and distribute it on the technological available media and through repositories.
Uaricha Psychology Magazine, is a quarterly publication, published by the Psychology College of the "Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo", Street Francisco Villa No. 450, Col. Dr. Miguel Silva, Morelia, Michoacán, P. C. 58110. Phone (+52) 443 312 9909, ext. 149, www.revistauaricha.umich.mx, uaricha.publicaciones@umich.mx. Responsible publisher: Roberto Oropeza Tena. Reserve of exclusive use rights No. 04-2013-070413365500-203, e-ISSN: 2007-7343, Granted by the National Institute Copyright. Responsible of the last update of this number, Computer center of the Psychology College, Ing. Erick Vidar Alva Rangel.
How to Cite
References
Brito, A. y Bastida, L. (2009). Informe de crímenes de odio por homofobia México 1995-2008 resultados preliminares. México: Letra S, Sida, Cultura y Vida Cotidiana A.C.
Butler, J. (1999). El género en disputa, El feminismo y la subversión de la identidad,México: Paidós, PUEG. UNAM.
Cooks, R. & Baur, K. (2004). Nuestra sexualidad. México: Thompson.
Hernández, O. (2007). Estudios sobre masculinidades. Aportes desde América Latina, Revista de Antropología experimental, 7, Universidad de Jaén, España. pp. 153-160.
Hernández, O. (2008). Debates y aportes en los estudios sobre masculinidades en México.Relaciones, 116 (26), 231-253.
Muñoz, J. (2010). Homofobia, laberinto de la ignorancia. México: UNAM.
Núñez, G. (2001). Reconociendo los placeres desconstruyendo las identidades, Desacatos.Revista de Antropología Social,Sexualidades, 6, 15-34
Ojeda, A. (2010). ¿Alguien sabe quiénes somos? Mapas conceptuales sobre la diversidad sexual, en Parrini, R. (2010).Instrucciones para sobrevivir en un mundo diverso, (pp. 37-76).México: PUEG, UNAM.
Papalia, D. (2004). Desarrollo humano, Bogotá, Colombia: Mc Graw Hill.
Riesenfeld, R. (2006). Bisexualidades: entre la homosexualidad y la heterosexualidad, México: Paidós.
Thompson, J. (1998). Ideología y cultura moderna, México, DF: UAM.