Case construction in Psychoanalysis: some structural elements and principles of its method
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The following article analyzes four psychoanalytic works that have been located within the methodological framework of case construction. The analysis of every section and how they are presented has yielded a number of structural elements that characterize this methodology. Two of them can be considered as essential: the reconstruction starting from different discourses that refer to the case studied while the source of emerging is stated; and a subsequent theoretical reflection to allow the reopening, questioning
and reflexion of the theory starting from the particularities suggested by the case. At the end of this article, we highlight similarities between this methodology and the sense that Freud and Lacan tried to give to psychoanalysis. Standing out a rigorous research and reworkin order to achieve precision in concepts and avoid the trap of falling into indoctrination and dogmatism.
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The authors have the right to ownership or copyright and they give to "Uaricha Psychology Magazine" the right to publish for the first time the article, as well as disclose and distribute it on the technological available media and through repositories.
Uaricha Psychology Magazine, is a quarterly publication, published by the Psychology College of the "Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo", Street Francisco Villa No. 450, Col. Dr. Miguel Silva, Morelia, Michoacán, P. C. 58110. Phone (+52) 443 312 9909, ext. 149, www.revistauaricha.umich.mx, uaricha.publicaciones@umich.mx. Responsible publisher: Roberto Oropeza Tena. Reserve of exclusive use rights No. 04-2013-070413365500-203, e-ISSN: 2007-7343, Granted by the National Institute Copyright. Responsible of the last update of this number, Computer center of the Psychology College, Ing. Erick Vidar Alva Rangel.
How to Cite
References
Allouch J.; Porge E. y Viltard, M. (1999). El doble crimen de las hermanas Papin. México, DF: Epeele
Capurro, R. y Nin, D. (2006). Yo lo maté- nos dijo- es mi padre. México: Epeele
Cancina P. (1997). La fábrica del caso: la Sra. C. Rosario, Argentina: Homo Sapiens
De la Mora. R.I. (2010). Abordaje clínico psicoanalítico del caso Sacher-Masoch (Tesis doctoral inédita). Facultad de Psicología de la Universidad Autónoma de Querétaro, Querétaro, México.
Freud, S. (1923b/2006). Una neurosis demoniaca del siglo XIX. En Obras completas. (Tomo XIX, pp.67-106). Buenos Aires: Amorrortu.
Freud, S.(1915/2006). Pulsiones y destinos de pulsión. En Obras completas. (Tomo IX, pp.105-134).Buenos Aires: Amorrortu.
Macías-López M. A.(2007) Algunas Puntualizaciones sobre la fábrica de caso.
Orozco, M., Gamboa, F., Pavón-Cuellar, D., Huerta, E., Cantoral, A. (2011). Configuraciones psicoanalíticas sobre espectros y fantasmas. México: Plaza y Valdez